No on the SO-Called Wealth Tax

Unprecedented. Extreme. Full of Unintended Consequences.

One Sacramento special interest group is pushing a likely unconstitutional ballot initiative that would do the exact opposite of what it proposes to do. The so-called wealth tax is a cynical money grab that is opposed by a broad cross-section of Californians — including Democrats, Republicans, Governor Gavin Newsom, and the California Chamber of Commerce.

A single healthcare union, with a history of abusing the ballot initiative process, is pushing this extreme measure that would:

Serve as a massive giveaway to big health insurance corporations

Provide NO funds to California's general fund to address affordability, homelessness, or education

Drive employers and innovation out of California

Force cuts to schools, health care, transportation, and housing — or trigger massive tax hikes — due to hundreds of millions per year in lost revenue

The California Legislative Analyst's Office (LAO) concluded that the measure would result in a "Likely Ongoing Decrease in State Income Tax Revenues… The reduction in state revenues from these kinds of responses could be hundreds of millions of dollars or more per year. This would mean less money for the state’s general budget that supports education, health care, prisons, and other services.

California

Join Governor Gavin Newsom and a growing coalition in saying NO to the So-Called Wealth Tax!

A mother and daughter, representing California families
I am signing up as:

*By clicking “Join the Coalition,” I consent to receive autodialed calls/texts at the phone number provided about campaign updates. Message and data rates may apply. Reply “STOP” to opt out. Text HELP for help.

Recent News

California’s Golden Goose Is Already Flying the Coop

“The state’s tax base is being hollowed out even before the ‘wealth tax’ qualifies for the ballot.”

“Should the tax be enacted and later struck down by the courts, Sacramento could face the daunting prospect of refunding tens of billions of dollars in previously collected taxes, plus interest, after the money has already been spent—as the initiative requires. That would transform an already difficult fiscal situation into a budget crisis.”

Wall Street Journal March 27, 2026

The ‘billionaire tax’ is a nightmare for California’s finances — and that’s only the beginning

California’s proposed ‘billionaire tax’  will collect less than half of what is promised — with a net fiscal effect that will leave the state in worse shape.

The state is attempting a crazy fiscal experiment: seeing how much revenue it can raise by aiming a large tax at a small group of people who are superbly well-equipped to move themselves — and their money — somewhere else.”

California Post March 16, 2026

Proposed wealth tax has some billionaires threatening to leave California

NBC News January 19, 2026

Billionaire Tax Plan Draws Fire From California Top Democrats

“To Porter, who’s known for progressive stances on consumer protections and health care, forcing California billionaires to pay a one-time 5% tax ‘could end up hurting our ability to fund other key priorities like education and food assistance and make it harder to sustainably fund California‘s needs.’”  

“[I]t could end up costing the state hundreds of millions per year in long-term revenue”  

“Tom Steyer, also a billionaire, said he supports a national wealth tax but warned of ‘unintended consequences’ on the California measure…”

Bloomberg January 16, 2026

The High Cost of Wealth Taxes

“Countries have repealed their wealth taxes for a variety of reasons. They raise little revenue, create high administrative costs, and induce an outflow of wealthy individuals and their money. Many policymakers have also recognized that high taxes on capital and wealth damage economic growth.”



“A wealth tax reduces wages, destroys jobs, and reduces the stock of capital. All income groups are worse off under a wealth tax due to decreased economic activity.”

Tax Foundation February 12, 2026

Experts Oppose

  • “Countries have repealed their wealth taxes for a variety of reasons. They raise little revenue, create high administrative costs, and induce an outflow of wealthy individuals and their money. Many policymakers have also recognized that high taxes on capital and wealth damage economic growth…. A wealth tax reduces wages, destroys jobs, and reduces the stock of capital. All income groups are worse off under a wealth tax due to decreased economic activity.”

    Cristina Enache, Economist at the Tax Foundation
  • “This could send stock prices plummeting to the detriment of tech employees and investors of all stripes, including ordinary workers whose 401(k)s would take a beating… A loss of jobs, startups, investment capital, and economic growth would be among the consequences of a large wave of departures, and of the tax burden on those who remain…”

    Jared Walczak, Senior Fellow at the Tax Foundation
  • “That would be a disaster for California’s economy, and its budget… Californians who care about the future of their state should reject this proposal…”

    The Washington Post Editorial Board
  • “[V]oters should be wary of any proposal promising easy solutions to erasing state government’s looming budget deficit, especially one that sets a reckless precedent without careful consideration of the consequences.”

    CalChamber
  • “[The tax would land] hardest on the very individuals who provide much of the capital that fuels startups, scales growing companies and supports job creation across the state.”

    The Bay Area Council

California Leaders Oppose

  • “It does not support our public educators. Does not support our teachers and counselors, our librarians. It doesn’t support our first responders and firefighters. Doesn’t support the general fund and parks.”

    Governor Gavin Newsom
  • “I’m perfectly fine with billionaires paying much more but let’s do it in a way that doesn’t kill California’s golden goose or transform California’s golden goose into Texas’ golden goose.”

    Sam Liccardo
  • “I’m not at all sympathetic to the billionaires whining about possible taxes, but it’s not at all clear to me that the proposed ballot measure would work and not backfire. There’s other reforms that can ensure everybody pays their fair share, and I’m evaluating those options.”

    Zoe Lofgren
  • “Everybody should be paying their fair share, but if people can up and flee, I’d rather see something done at the national level.”

    San Francisco Mayor Daniel Lurie

Major Candidates For Governor Oppose

  • “We need a rising economic tide to lift all boats, not a political plan that will sink California’s innovation economy… The people who lose in the long run are California families who will be asked to foot more of the bill for government services and infrastructure.”

    Matt Mahan
  • “No one in this race has fought harder to make the ultrarich pay their fair share. In Congress, I strongly supported efforts to raise taxes on billionaires,” Porter said. “However, I have real concerns about this specific proposal because it could end up hurting our ability to fund other key priorities like education and food assistance and make it harder to sustainably fund California’s needs.”

    Katie Porter
  • “Yes to real revenue, but no to this initiative… Every Californian must pay their fair share, and no billionaire should pay taxes at rates lower than teachers, firefighters or nurses. But this is sketchy policy.”

    Xavier Becerra
  • “The problem with the wealth tax: because of the upper income tax and because of our over-regulating business climate, a lot of these people have left already. We pass that wealth tax, they’re all going.”

    Antonio Villaraigosa
  • “[M]ost Californians would agree that billionaires should pay more, but this one-time wealth tax, as proposed, isn’t the solution. It’s a short-term fix layered onto a system that lacks accountability, doesn’t create sustainable revenue, and risks pushing investment — and long-term tax dollars — out of the state.”

    Ian Calderon
  • “California’s problem will not be fixed by taxing people merely because they’re successful. By taxing billionaires, billionaires will leave, the jobs they create will leave, and we will further destroy the middle class.”

    Chad Bianco
  • “When job creators leave, the jobs go with them. So does the tax base that funds schools, infrastructure and essential services.”

    Steve Hilton

Major Candidates for Lt. Governor Oppose

  • “As state treasurer I am concerned with the impact on the state budget, and I agree with the legislative analyst that this particular proposal could lead to more revenue losses than revenue gains for the state. I oppose it. We have a structural problem with the state budget that this measure would not solve.”

    Fiona Ma
  • “I support changes to our tax code to ensure the wealthy and corporations pay their fair share. But I can’t support a poorly crafted wealth tax that, according to California’s own Legislative Analyst Office, will diminish California’s overall tax base and weaken the State’s ability to provide critical services in the long term.”

    Josh Fryday
  • “I support revenue measures such as extending the Prop 55 millionaires tax, property tax reform for corporations, and penalties on large employers whose workers rely on public assistance. However, I am concerned this particular proposal could push future tax revenue out of state, and look forward to working with its supporters to find a balance that raises needed revenue while protecting California’s long-term fiscal health.”

    Michael Tubbs
  • “No, I do not support the proposed state ballot measure to enact a “one-time,” 5 percent wealth tax on billionaires. The wealth tax is exactly the kind of crazy idea I walked away from when I left the Democrat Party.”

    Gloria Romero
  • “The ultra-wealthy should contribute more. Billionaires are doing better than ever. I’m open to a billionaire tax, but the details matter. This bill, as drafted, will be challenged in court. We have an $18B deficit, but we hear nothing about it from our treasurer or other leaders.”

    Janelle Kellman